Editing Neorealism (International Relations)
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Neorealism or Structural Realism was first outlined by [[Waltz, Kenneth|Kenneth Waltz]] in ''Theory of International Politics'' (1979), in which Waltz argues in favour of a systematic approach to [[International Relations]] by which the international structure is seen to act as a constraint on state behaviour. Neorealism dismissed classical realism’s use of essentialist concepts such as “human behaviour” to explain international politics and believes that the international system is inherently conflict- ridden as when one state achieves gains, others will immediately feel threatened, which is known as the [[Security Dilemma|security dilemma]]. Peace, for neorealists, is only reached when a certain [[Balance of Power|balance of power]] is reached between states. | Neorealism or Structural Realism was first outlined by [[Waltz, Kenneth|Kenneth Waltz]] in ''Theory of International Politics'' (1979), in which Waltz argues in favour of a systematic approach to [[International Relations]] by which the international structure is seen to act as a constraint on state behaviour. Neorealism dismissed classical realism’s use of essentialist concepts such as “human behaviour” to explain international politics and believes that the international system is inherently conflict- ridden as when one state achieves gains, others will immediately feel threatened, which is known as the [[Security Dilemma|security dilemma]]. Peace, for neorealists, is only reached when a certain [[Balance of Power|balance of power]] is reached between states. | ||
[[Category:The Cultural Diplomacy Dictionary]] | [[Category:The Cultural Diplomacy Dictionary]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |